The respondent-failure writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed in default by the learned court due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed in default; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 23842 of 2006
Petitioner :- Ram Subhash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Srivastava,Arun Srivastava,B.N. Pathak,P.K.Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
List has been revised.
None appears to press the writ petition on behalf of the petitioner. The name of the learned counsel for the petitioner is shown in the cause list. Learned Standing Counsel is present.
The writ petition is dismissed in default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.9.2018 Ashish Tripathi
Ram Subhash
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
