Dismissed
Raj Kumar Lal v. Lekhadhikari and Others
Allahabad HCWRIA/22864/1992
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to a connected petition. NoLegal substance extracted.
What the court decided
AI extract
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to a connected petition. NoLegal substance extracted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 22864 of 1992
Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Lal Respondent :- Lekhadhikari & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.N.Singh,A.S.Diwakar Counsel for Respondent :- SC,A.P. Sahai,G.K. Singh,N. Rai,R.N. Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
In view of the order passed in the connected Writ Petition No.6468 of 1997, no order is required to be passed in this writ petition.
It it, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.3.2018 T. Sinha
Raj Kumar Lal
Lekhadhikari
Others
Hon'ble Siddharth, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court