The High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, due to typographical errors noted by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14575 of 2018
Petitioner :- Smt. Rajvati Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Narayan Singh Yadav,Maithali Sharan Pipersenia
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Sri M.S. Pipersenia, learned counsel counsel for the petitioner states that there are some typographical error in this writ petition and, therefore, the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
Order Date :- 12.7.2018 Ak/
Smt. Rajvati Devi
State Of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
