A single judge disposed of a writ petition challenging a government employee's suspension. Directing the respondent to complete the inquiry within six months, the court allowed the petitioner time for the final outcome rather than quashing the suspension itself.
Direction to complete inquiry within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 13633 of 2006
Petitioner :- Surya Narayan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru' Secondary And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mani Kant Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Illegbile
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
List has been revised.
None appears to press the writ petition on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.
The petitioner was suspended by order dated 2.2.2006 passed by the respondent No.2. The writ petition is directed against the order of suspension dated 2.2.2006 passed by the respondent no.2.
Learned Standing Counsel points out that the charge as disclosed in the order of suspension is grave enough to warrant a dismissal from service in case charge stands approved.
The interim order was passed by this court on 7.3.2006. Since 12 years have passed, it is likely that the enquiry has been completed. The petitioner has not brought any subsequent development in the record. In case the enquiry against the petitioner has not been completed, the respondent authorities shall complete the same within a period of six months, in accordance with law and if permissible in law, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 9.8.2018 Ashish Tripathi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition against the suspension order should be disposed of given the pendency of the inquiry.
Surya Narayan Singh
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
