Learned counsel for the respondent has also pointed out that the landlady had only two rooms on the first floor of the house in question, namely, House No. 11/47 A, Galwal Toli, Sootar Ganj, Kanpur Nagar, and to accommodate the need of the growing family, she had taken on rent one room, one veranda and courtyard of adjoining House No. 11/47. The Prescribed Authority while considering the bona fide need of the landlady had noted that the landlady and her husband were both old, and they were residing in the second floor in two rooms of the house in question, whereas the tenant-petitioner was residing on the first floor. The Prescribed Authority had although taken into account the alleged additional accommodation said to be available to the landlady on the ground floor, it has found that two shops exists on the ground floor, which had already been let out on rent. The Prescribed Authority has made a note of the fact that in the adjoining house, the landlady had taken additional accommodation on rent and she should not be forced to live on rent where she owned the house,
