The court dismissed a special appeal seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal, as the application was already barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 90 of 2012 Appellant :- Ram Ladaitey Prajapati Respondent :- Superintendent Of Police Fatehgarh Farrukhabad Counsel for Appellant :- R.S. Pandey,Rajshree Malviya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
Order on application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 sailesh
. . .
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 90 of 2012 Appellant :- Ram Ladaitey Prajapati Respondent :- Superintendent Of Police Fatehgarh Farrukhabad Counsel for Appellant :- R.S. Pandey,Rajshree Malviya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
The application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal having been rejected vide order of date, this appeal being barred by limitation, is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 sailesh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal was barred by limitation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Ladaitey Prajapati
Superintendent Of Police Fatehgarh Farrukhabad
Sudhir Agarwal
Shashi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
