Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 259…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 259 of 2018
Appellant :- Ordnance Equipment Factory Prarambhik Sahkari Bank Limited And Another Respondent :- Om Shanker Mishra And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Sujit Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shyam Singh Sengar
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.1 of 2018
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we are satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the Special Appeal within the period of limitation.
The application is, accordingly, allowed and the delay in filing the Special Appeal is condoned.
Order on the order sheet:
After the matter had been heard for some time, learned counsel for the appellant states that the Special Appeal may be dismissed as not pressed as the appellant intends to file a reply in the writ petition.
The Special Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 17.5.2018 Junaid
(Dilip Gupta,J.)
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.)
Ordnance Equipment Factory Prarambhik Sahkari Bank Limited
Om Shanker Mishra
Dilip Gupta
Neeraj Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
