This court dismissed a special appeal filed under laches due to a delay of 1 year and 277 days, finding the appellant's explanation insufficient for condoning the delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 29
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 21 of 2018
Appellant :- Vaibhav Sagar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Rashtrapati Khare,Rachna Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vimlesh Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Tarun Agarwala,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
The special appeal has been filed under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the High Court Rules, 1952. The limitation for filing of appeal is 30 days. In the instant case the delay is of 1 year 277 days. The explanation given in appeal is unsatisfactory.
The appeal is dismissed on account of laches.
Order Date :- 19.1.2018 Mini
(Saumitra Dayal Singh, J.) (Tarun Agarwala, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the special appeal was maintainable despite a delay of over a year?
Vaibhav Sagar Pandey
State Of U.P.
Tarun Agarwala
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
