This is a special appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act regarding an application to condone delay. The application for revision was dismissed for want of prosecution. The appellant's appeal is dismissed as it was barred by limitation.
Special Appeal dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 190 of 2009 Appellant :- Allaha Rakha & Others Respondent :- IIIrd Additional District Judge & Others Counsel for Appellant :- Lal Chandra Sahu
Order on Application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
Order Date :- 16.02 .2018 AK
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 190 of 2009 Appellant :- Allaha Rakha & Others Respondent :- IIIrd Additional District Judge & Others Counsel for Appellant :- Lal Chandra Sahu
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
The application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal having been rejected vide order of date, this appeal being barred by limitation, is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 16.02 .2018 AK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal be allowed.
Whether the appeal is barred by limitation since the application for condonation was rejected.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Allaha Rakha & Others
IIIrd Additional District Judge & Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Shashi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
