The Hon'ble High Court dismissed the second appeal as abated. A concurrent civil miscellaneous application sought abatement due to non-substitution of legal heirs of the sole appellant. The application was allowed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Abatement application allowed; second appeal dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 12
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 2208 of 1987
Appellant :- Ram Lakhan Respondent :- Basdeo Lal Counsel for Appellant :- J.A. Azami,S.K. Singh,V.K. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- B. Tewari,Bashisth,Usha Kiran
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Order on the Civil Misc. Abatement Application No. 361467 of 2017
List has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the appellant.
This is an abatement application filed by the learned counsel for the respondent praying for dismissing the appeal on the ground of non-substitution of legal heirs of deceased sole appellant.
The application is allowed.
Order on the appeal
This second appeal is dismissed as abated.
Order Date :- 9.7.2018 Ruchi Agrahari
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Lakhan
Basdeo Lal
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
