Appeal against an order dismissing a delay condonation application. The court held the appeal must fail as the underlying application was dismissed for default.
Appeal dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 87 of 2001
Appellant :- Hari Om & Others Respondent :- Hari Narain & Others Counsel for Appellant :- Haridwar Singh
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
(In Ref. : Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.nil of 2001)
Called in revise.
None present.
The delay condonation application is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 18.1.2018 Irshad
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 87 of 2001
Appellant :- Hari Om & Others Respondent :- Hari Narain & Others Counsel for Appellant :- Haridwar Singh
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Since the delay condonation application is dismissed, the appeal is also dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.1.2018 Irshad
Hari Om & Others
Hari Narain & Others
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
