Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Mukhtar Ahmad
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge appeals dismissed for want of prosecution; appeal barred by limitation.
Single judge appeals dismissed for want of prosecution; appeal barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 194 of 1993
Appellant :- Employees State Insurance Corporation Respondent :- Mukhtar Ahmad Counsel for Appellant :- Saral Srivastava
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
(Ref: C.M. Delay Condonation Application)
Order Date :- 5.1.2018/DKS
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 194 of 1993
Appellant :- Employees State Insurance Corporation Respondent :- Mukhtar Ahmad Counsel for Appellant :- Saral Srivastava
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Since application seeking condonation of delay in filing this appeal has been dismissed vide order of date, the appeal being barred by limitation, is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 5.1.2018/DKS
Employees State Insurance Corporation
Mukhtar Ahmad
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court