The single-judge bench allowed a condonation of delay application by the appellant. Subsequently, dismissing the first appeal as the controversy was identical to a previously dismissed appeal, citing the prior judgment.
Delay carried. Appeal dismissed with standard direction for registration and preserving old number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 181 of 2018
Appellant :- M/S Sanjay Construction Company and another Respondent :- State of U.P. and others Counsel for Appellant :- Ravindra Prakash Srivastava, Sanjai Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
filing appeal.
Dt. 13.02.2018 PS
(Delay Con. App. 1/2018)
Court No. - 34
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 181 of 2018
Appellant :- M/S Sanjay Construction Company and another Respondent :- State of U.P. and others Counsel for Appellant :- Ravindra Prakash Srivastava, Sanjai Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J. Hon'ble Siddharth, J.
Dt. 13.02.2018 PS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the first appeal is condonable.
Whether the present appeal should be decided on merits in view of a similar previous disposal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/S Sanjay Construction Company and another Vs. State of U.P. and othersFollowed¶18
First Appeal From Order (Def.) No. 178 of 2018
M/S Sanjay Construction Company and another
State of U.P. and others
Sudhir Agarwal
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
