A single-judge appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution in a condonation of delay application, resulting in the subsequent dismissal of the appeal for being barred by limitation.
Appeal dismissed for being barred by limitation after delay condonation rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 152 of 1997
Appellant :- Aijaz Khan Respondent :- M.C.Gupta & Others Counsel for Appellant :- P.K.Saxena
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
(Ref: C.M. Delay Condonation Application)
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 152 of 1997
Appellant :- Aijaz Khan Respondent :- M.C.Gupta & Others Counsel for Appellant :- P.K.Saxena
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Since application seeking condonation of delay in filing this appeal has been dismissed vide order of date, the appeal being barred by limitation, is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 3.1.2018/DKS
Aijaz Khan
M.C. Gupta & Others
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
