The single judge dismissed the first appeal as withdrawn because the appellant informed the court that a compromise had been reached between the parties.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 26 Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 478 of 2017 Appellant :- Anil Kumar Gupta Respondent :- Brij Mohan And 6 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Govind Krishna,Abhishek Krishna Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Syed Mehdi Haider Zaidi
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
(Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 2 of 2018)
Sri Abhishek Krishna, learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant, states that some compromise has been arrived between the contesting parties and therefore, the appellant does not want to press the appeal.
In view of the above, withdrawal application is allowed.
Order Date :- 6.7.2018 IrfanUddin
Court No. - 26
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 478 of 2017 Appellant :- Anil Kumar Gupta Respondent :- Brij Mohan And 6 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Govind Krishna,Abhishek Krishna Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Syed Mehdi Haider Zaidi
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
In view of the order passed today in Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 2 of 2018, the appeal is permitted to be dismissed as withdrawn.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 6.7.2018 IrfanUddin
Anil Kumar Gupta
Brij Mohan and 6 Others
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
