Revision not pressed by the appellant and dismissed.
Not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 776 of 2017
Revisionist :- Richpal Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Santosh Tripathi,Mandvi Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Shri Ajay Kumar Yadav, advocate holding brief of Shri Santosh Tripathi and Mandvi Tripathi, learned counsel for the revisionist states that the revisionist does not want to press the revision.
Dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 9.7.2018 shiv
Richpal Sharma
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
