In Criminal Revision No. 1676 of 2018, the High Court of Uttar Pradesh dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue other available legal remedies, effective 21.5.2018.
Revision dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to avail other legal remedies granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1676 of 2018
Revisionist :- Devnath Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Nitin Chandra Mishra,Anoop Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the revisionist states that this revision may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the revisionist to avail any other legal remedy which may be available to him under the law.
As prayed, the present revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the revisionist to avail any other legal remedy which may be available to him under the law.
Office is directed to return the certified copy of the order, if any, to the learned counsel for the revisionist.
Order Date :- 21.5.2018
CPP/-
Devnath Yadav
State Of U.P.
Karuna Nand Bajpayee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
