Bakir and Another v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1655 of 2009…
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1655 of 2009…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1655 of 2009
Revisionist :- Bakir & Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Ashfaq Ahmad Ansari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
List has been revised.Today this revision is listed peremptorily, even in the revised list no one appears on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.
This revision has been filed against the judgement and order dated 23.3.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge,Fast Track Court No.5, Sharanpur in S.T. No. 111 of 2009(Baqir Vs. State ) under section 25 Arms Act and S.T. No. 112 of 2009 (Anis vs. State) under Section 25 Arms Act against the conviction and sentence undergone during the pendency of the trial and fine of Rs. 100/- each and in case of default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for seven days.
Perusal of the judgement of the court below shows that it has only awarded punishment of Rs. 100/as fine.
The allegations are proved against the revisionist. Fine of Rs.100/- each imposed by the court below can not be considered to be excessive, the revision fails and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 8.8.2018 Atul kr. sri.
Bakir & Another
State Of U.P.
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court