Petitioner sought withdrawal of his application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. supported by an affidavit. The court dismissed the ongoing application as withdrawn and allowed the withdrawal.
The instant application was dismissed as withdrawn; the withdrawal application was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49 Cr. Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 2 of 2018
IN
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 131 of 2017
Revisionist :- Dr. Rakesh Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Nigamendra Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Achyuta Nand Pandey
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
This is an application for withdrawal of the application u/s 482 Cr.P.C.. It is supported with an affidavit of the applicant.
Sri Komal Singh Yadav holding brief of Sri Nigmendra Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant submits that in view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the withdrawal application, the present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the averments made in the withdrawal application, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn. The withdrawal application is allowed.
Order Date :- 7.5.2018 Lbm/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Rakesh Kumar Pandey
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
