A criminal miscellaneous writ petition for want of prosecution was dismissed as none appeared on behalf of the petitioner in the revised list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9812 of 2004
Petitioner :- Hari Ram Vind Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- P.C. Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,R.P. Ram
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
None is present on behalf of petitioner even in the revised list. Learned AGA is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be transmitted to the Court concerned immediately for information.
Order Date :- 26.9.2018 P.P.
Hari Ram Vind
State Of U.P.
Aniruddha Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
