Bittu v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In this criminal miscellaneous writ petition, the petitioner challenged the First Information Report under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The High Court held that the FIR disclosed serious cognizable offences and found no justifiable reason to interfere. The petition was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted; writ petition dismissed; stay on arrest denied.