Writ petition to quash FIR in matrimonial dispute was disposed of. Court granted bail to five petitioners pending investigation and dismissed the prayer for quash against the first petitioner.
Bail to petitioners nos. 2 to 6 pending police report; prayer for quash dismissed against petitioner no. 1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5578 of 2018
Petitioner :- Rajneesh Kumar And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.
Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Jitendra Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer to quash the FIR dated 22.1.2018, in case crime no.29 of 2018, u/s 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 328 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, district Ghaziabad.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the marriage between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.4 was solemnized in the year 2016. The impugned FIR has been lodged by the informant roping in the entire family of her husband, petitioner no. 1 containing absolutely false, concocted, vague and sweeping allegations against them that they were demanding dowry from her and her parents and on account of non fulfilment of the alleged demands of dowry she was being tortured and maltreated by them in her matrimonial home. It has next been submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the FIR no credible evidence whatsoever is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the petitioners' complicity in the commission of the alleged offence qua the petitioner nos. 2 to 6 hence the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed.
Per contra learned AGA opposed the prayer for quashing and submitted that the impugned FIR is not liable to be quashed on the basis of the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
After having heard learned counsel for the parties present and perused the impugned FIR as well as the other material brought on record, we dispose of this writ petition with the following directions:
(i) Investigation of the aforesaid case shall go on but the petitioner nos.2 to 6 shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case till the submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C., subject to their cooperation during investigation.
(ii) As far as the petitioner no. 1 is concerned, the petition stand dismissed.
With this direction, this petition is finally disposed of.
(Krishna Pratap Singh, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 7.3.2018 Gaurav
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition to quash the FIR must be allowed or dismissed.
Whether the petitioners should be granted bail or allowed to face investigation.
Rajneesh Kumar And 5 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Ramesh Sinha
Krishna Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
