Brijraj @ Dhedhai and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 29

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4054 of 2018

Petitioner :- Brijraj @ Dhedhai And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yatharth Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Ashok Kumar,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the Staterespondents.

¶6

This petition for writ is before us to have a direction to quash the FIR dated 9.1.2018 bearing Case Crime No.0012 of 2018, pending investigation at Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Mirzapur for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308 IPC.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no case is made out against the petitioners for the offences referred in the FIR.

¶8

We have looked into the FIR that is challenged in this petition for writ. A bare perusal of the contents of the FIR discloses the commission of serious offences which are cognizable. Looking to definite accusation we are at all not inclined to interfere with the same while invoking powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

¶9

However, looking to the merits of the case and the surrounding circumstances, we deem it appropriate to direct the Station House Officer, respondent no.3 not to arrest the petitioners Brijraj @ Dhedhai, Manish and Munna in relation to FIR, referred to above, till submission of the police report under the provisions of Section 173 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners shall cooperate the investigating agency during the course of investigation.

¶10

Petition stands disposed of as above.

¶11

Order Date :- 20.2.2018 pk

¶12

(Ashok Kumar,J.) (Govind Mathur,J.)

Brijraj @ Dhedhai and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brijraj @ Dhedhai and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Sarswat and 2 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and 2 Ors.

Sukhdeo Singh Yadav and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and 3 Ors.

Vivek Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Ors.

Manju Srivastava and Another Vs State of U.P. through Principal Secretary Home Govt. of U.P Lucknow and 3 Others

Sandeep Mishra @ Satya Prakash and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Ors.

Priyanka Deepak and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others