Writ petition for criminal miscellaneous relief dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or acknowledge notice after service.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 35786 of 1991
Petitioner :- Satendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Other Counsel for Petitioner :- V.K.Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
As per office report dated 6.8.2012 notice was issued to the petitioner by RPAD but neither acknowledgement nor undelivered cover has been returned back after service of notice.
None is present on behalf of petitioner even in revised list. Learned AGA is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.8.2018 P.P.
Satendra Kumar
State Of U.P.
Aniruddha Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
