The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to conduct a fair investigation. The High Court dismissed the petition as vague and without substance. No justice was done on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3134 of 2018
Petitioner :- Jain Narayan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Majahar Ali Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Ashok Kumar,J.
By this petition for writ, the petitioner is seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus for respondent nos.2 and 3 " to arrange to conduct the fair and proper investigation so that justice be done" .
The writ petition is liable to be dismissed as to what is grievance of the petitioner and what requires fair investigation.
The writ petition being absolutely vague and is dismissed .
Order Date :- 8.2.2018 A.Kr.*
[Ashok Kumar, J.] [Govind Mathur, J.]
Jain Narayan
State Of U.P.
Govind Mathur
Ashok Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
