Santosh Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear. Interim order vacated and office directed to transmit copy.
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear. Interim order vacated and office directed to transmit copy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2886 of 2010
Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- K. Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Sri Shiv Nath Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.2 is present but his name is not printed in the cause list as he has already filed his vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2 which is on record.
Learned A.G.A for the State is present.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned immediately to proceed with the case in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 24.10.2018/SKD
Santosh Kumar Yadav
State Of U.P.
ANIRUDDHA SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court