This criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed as the underlying matter became infructuous following a police report submission, rendering the interim order vacated on 2.5.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 28381 of 2017
Petitioner :- Smt. Seema Vishwakarma And Anr. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mahboob Ali,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Sarver Khan, learned counsel for the complainant.
The court has been informed that after investigation, the police has submitted report, as such, as on date, the present matter has become infructuous.
In view of the above, present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 2.5.2018
T.S.
Smt. Seema Vishwakarma
State Of U.P.
Vipin Sinha
Mahboob Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
