In Cr.M.C. W.P. No. 2820 of 2018, the High Court dismissed the petitioner's petition for want of prosecution due to non-appearance. The vacated interim order was stayed.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; vacated interim order stays.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2820 of 2018
Petitioner :- Azim Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shabeena Begum,Ashiyam Nasir Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. Sri Irshad Husain, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(D.K. Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 5.4.2018 A. Mandhani
Azim
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Ramesh Sinha
Dinesh Kumar Singh-I
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
