The petitioner filed a writ petition to quash an FIR under 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 504, 506 IPC. The court held the petition infructuous as the petitioner had already been arrested and dismissed it.
No; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 27371 of 2018
Petitioner :- Kapil Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Bala Krishna Narayana,J. Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.
This petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 23.01.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 67 of 2018, under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 504, 506 IPC, PS Dankar, District Gautam Budh Nagar.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already been arrested and this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 1.10.2018 Sazia
Kapil
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Bala Krishna Narayana
Naheed Ara Moonis
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
