Anupam Kumar Shukla v. State of U.P. and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the prayer to quash the FIR due to cognizable offence averment but directed the SHO not to arrest the petitioner until a police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. is filed.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner not to be arrested in Crime No. 1226 of 2017 pending investigation until filing of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.