Rajendra Kumar Verma Vs State of U.P.

Court No. - 10

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1589 of 2018

Petitioner :- Rajendra Kumar Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr Anurag Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Ashok Kumar,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

This petition for writ is before us with a prayer to quash the First Information Report dated 14.1.2018 bearing Case Crime No. 17 of 2018 pending investigation at Police Station Bhopa, District Muzaffar Nagar pertaining to the offences under Section 380 IPC.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case on absolutely concocted facts. No case is made out against the petitioner for the offences referred in the present F.I.R.

¶8

We have looked into the contents of the First Information Report. The averments contained therein disclose commission of offence cognizable and therefore, at this stage, we are not inclined to quash the First Information Report.

¶9

However, looking to all the facts of the case and other surrounding circumstances, we deem it appropriate to direct the Station House Officer, P.S. Bhopa, District Muzaffar Nagar not to arrest the petitioner Rajendra Kumar Verma and Sunny in Case Crime No.17 of 2018 pending investigation at Police Station Bhopa, District Muzaffar Nagar pertaining to the offences under Section 380 IPC till filing of the police report as per provisions of Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. before the Court competent. The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigating agency during course of investigation.

¶10

The writ petition, with the observation above, stands disposed of.

¶11

Order Date :- 1.2.2018 S.S.

¶12

(Ashok Kumar, J.) (Govind Mathur, J.)

Rajendra Kumar Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Kumar Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Chandra Shukla Vs State of U.P. and 2 Ors.

Nepali and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Hari Prasad Sethigar Vs State of U.P.

Anil Yadav and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

baburam and 5 others Vs State of U.P. and 2 others

raju and 3 others Vs State of U.P. and 3 others