Allowed

saroj and 3 Ors. v. State of U.P. and 2 Ors.

Allahabad HC29 May 2018CRLP/1561/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of this certiorari petition filed for quashing an FIR in a domestic matter. Relying on precedents regarding domestic disputes, the Court stayed coercive action pending the police report while directing fair and expeditious investigation within three months.

What did the court decide?

Coercive action against petitioners stayed till police report under S. 173(2) Cr.P.C.; police directed to submit report within three months.

saroj and 3 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and 2 Ors. — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 51

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1561 of 2018

¶3

Petitioner :- Saroj And 3 Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mahboob Ali,J.

¶5

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶6

In view of office report service of notice upon respondent no.3 is deemed to be sufficient.

¶7

This writ petition has been filed for issuing a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR registered as Case Crime No. 03 of 2018 u/s 363, 366, 120B, 504 IPC and 7/8 POCSO Act PS Dannahar District Mainpuri.

¶8

We have perused the interim order dated 24.1.2018 which shows that both the petitioners are adult and have solemnized marriage.

¶9

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the law as laid down in the case of Sachin Pawar v. State of U.P. Passed in Criminal Appeal No. 1142 of 2013 decided on 2.8.2013 , no purpose would be served in keeping the present matter pending any further before this Court. Accordingly, the present writ petition is being disposed off finally with the following directions:-

¶10

(a) Till the submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. no coercive action shall be taken or initiated against the petitioners, however they shall participate and cooperate with the investigation;

¶11

(b) Copy of this order shall be forwarded to the concerned SSP/SP through the office of Government Advocate of this Court, who shall personally look into the matter and thereafter shall ensure that fair investigation is done in accordance with law without any whims, caprice or personal notion of morality;

¶12

(c) The police authorities are directed to investigate the matter fairly expeditiously and submit the report as per the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and in accordance with the law preferably within a period of three months from today keeping in view the law as laid down by the Division Bench of this Court at Lucknow Bench in the case of Vishal Jaiswal and another v. State of U.P. and others passed on 26.8.2016 in Misc. Bench No. 10724 of 2016 and Shaheen Parveen and another v. State of U.P. And others passed in writ petition no. 3519 (M/B) of 2015 and by the Apex Court in the cases of Lata Singh v. State of U.P. And another; 2011(6) SCC 396 and Shakti Vahini v. Union of India passed in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 231 of 2010.

¶13

(d) It is also being made clear that if the investigation has been completed

¶14

and the police has already submitted report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C., the present order will not be given effect to.

¶15

The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed off finally.

¶16

Order Date :- 29.5.2018 SP

saroj and 3 Ors. v. State of U.P. and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

saroj and 3 Ors. v. State of U.P. and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sangeeta Agrawal and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Amvika Prasad Gautam and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Smt. Anjali Kuamri and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and 3 Ors.

Sushmi Kumari and 7 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Diskha Sharma and Another Vs State of U.P. and 02 Others

Rekha and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others