The single-judge court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition regarding police investigation proceedings. The petition was declared infructuous as the final police report had been submitted, rendering it no longer efficacious.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1322 of 2018
Petitioner :- Pramila @ Pramita Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr Raj Kumar Dhama Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mahboob Ali,J.
List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition.
Shri V.K. Pandey, learned Additional Government Advocate has informed the Court that after investigation, the police has submitted final report in the present case, which is mentioned in paragraph No. 9 of the counter affidavit. He submits that the present writ petition has lost its efficacy and has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 10.5.2018 Sumaira
Pramila @ Pramita
State Of U.P.
Vipin Sinha
Mahboob Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
