High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous because the final report had been submitted in the underlying case.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous. The interim order (if any) is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11544 of 2017
Petitioner :- Arjun Vishwakarma & Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.
Sri Pramod Kumar Vishwakarma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Ibha Sinha, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the final report has been submitted in the present case, hence the present petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Krishna Pratap Singh,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Order Date :- 12.3.2018 A.K.Verma
Arjun Vishwakarma
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Krishna Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
