The criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the case.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution and any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1094 of 2018
Petitioner :- Shivam Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Shankar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. Sri Irshad Husain, learned brief holder for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 23.5.2018 A. Mandhani
Shivam Gupta
State Of U.P.
2 Ors.
Ramesh Sinha
Dinesh Kumar Singh-I
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
