Learned counsel for the appellants submits that
after going through the judgement, he is of the view
that in so far conviction part of the judgement and
order impugned dated 24.02.1987 is concerned, the
same is not being assailed and the claim is
relinquished. However, on the point of quantum of
sentence, he adds that initially instead of
sentencing the appellant under various Sections of
charge framed against them, the court directed them
to keep peace and good behaviour for the aforesaid
period and for that purpose asked them to furnish
personal bond along with two sureties each for
Rs.4000/- before the District Probation Officer,
Kanpur. He submits that period prescribed for keep
peace and good behaviour ought to have been
restricted to one year and the amount for sureties
for keeping peace and good behaviour ought to have
been reduced to Rs.2000/-. However, he further
submitted that in this case appellants have
maintained good behaviour and kept peace till now,
and no adverse information/report from any corner
has been received against them either by the trial
court or from the side of the State, which may show
that appellants ever acted in violation of the
direction and the mandate of the trial court and
they were not of good behaviour and they violated
term for keeping peace. Learned counsel claims that
a mild view ought to have been taken for submission
raised by the appellant and benefit of probation
ought to have been given to the accused, then the
