Rajendra Singh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In this rejected criminal appeal, the High Court bench of Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi, J., dismissed the petition by the appellant solely because the allegation against him involved abhorring behavior of outraging modesty of a 7-year-old child.
What the court decided
Court No. - 54
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 4458 of 2017
Appellant :- Rajendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Appellant :- Bansh Narain Rai,Adarsh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anand Srivastava
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Sri Anand Srivastava, Advocate filed vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant, is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants/appellants and learned
AGA for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants submitted that appellant has falsely been implicated in this case.
I have gone through the contents of the FIR which was registered case crime no. 0138 of 2017 under Sections 376, 504 IPC, Section 6 POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act by the mother of the victim on 03.05.2018 and appellant is sole named accused person. The allegation made by the mother against the applicant/appellant is that her daughter is aged about 7 years and when she went to attend the call of nature in the nearby Bagh where the applicant/appellant tried to outrage her modesty by fingering in her private organs. The allegation itself shows the abhorring behaviour, accordingly the present appeal is hereby rejected.Accordingly, this criminal appeal is hereby rejected.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal filed by the appellant under false implication should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajendra Singh
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Rahul Chaturvedi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/4458/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court