Dismissed
Tika Ram v. State
Allahabad HCCRLA/2226/1990
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Criminal Appeal was dismissed as abated because the sole appellant had expired without substituting legal representatives.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 3
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2226 of 1990
¶3
Appellant :- Tika Ram Respondent :- State Counsel for Appellant :- M G Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J. Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
¶5
Sole appellant Tika Ram has expired.
¶6
There is no application for substitution of legal representatives of the deceased appellant.
¶7
Appeal is accordingly dismissed being abated.
¶8
Order Date :- 7.12.2018 Fhd.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Tika Ram
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Pradeep Diwaker
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/2226/1990
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court