The C.A. was dismissed as abated because the appellants, Rajoo and Kalua, were deceased with no application to substitute legal representatives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2059 of 1989
Appellant :- Rajoo And Anothers Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Ravindra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- D.G.A.
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J. Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
In this appeal there are two appellants Rajoo and Kalua @ Kallu and both have expired.
There is no application for substitution of legal representatives of the deceased appellants.
Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed being abated.
Order Date :- 12.12.2018 Fhd.
Rajoo And Anothers
State Of U.P.
Pritinker Diwaker
Umesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
