The civil revision was dismissed as infructuous due to the passage of time. The court noted no objections were raised to this finding.
Dismissal of the revision as infructuous with liberty to file an application for recall within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 591 of 1989
Revisionist :- Vishwa Nath Dubey Opposite Party :- Lala Ram Sharma Counsel for Revisionist :- H.S. Nigam
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
The revision was notified as likely to be infructuous inviting objections but no one took up the plea that the revision still survives.
The revision is listed in the daily cause list under the heading "group of cases likely to be infructuous (without objection)".
Perused the office report dated 17.7.2018.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the revision appears to have been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
It is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the parties to file an application for recall of this order within a month, in case it has not become infructuous and requires adjudication on merits.
Order Date :- 25.7.2018 Lalit Shukla
Vivek Kumar Birla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
