A single judge dismissed a civil revision as infructuous due to the efflux of time, thereby rendering the matter disposed of without substantive adjudication.
Revision dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time; interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 400 of 2013
Revisionist :- Rajendra Prasad Singh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- Praveen Kumar Singh And 6 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Manish Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Jitendra Sarin
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Shri Manish Kumar Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of the revisionist states that this revision has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
In view of the statement so made, this revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 6.7.2018 Priyanka
KUMAR MISHRAANJANI Digitally signed by ANJANI KUMAR MISHRADN: C=IN, O=Personal, PostalCode=211001, S=Uttar Pradesh, Phone=f6e3ce979d8983acfc0b3ea049885bf64ad5bbb33050e3dfe3e210927d94f413, SERIALNUMBER=004ee64f25f9f36f85dbdc71f5b0ec1e2f0938431e25dbbadc93823915b36c6f, CN=ANJANI KUMAR MISHRAReason: I am the author of this documentLocation: Date: 2018-07-06 15:14:35
Anjani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
