Le. Karnal R..K. Singh v. Manoj Kumar Sabnani and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The present civil revision and writ petition were dismissed as the revisionist had withdrawn the applications. The interim order, if any, was also vacated.
The present civil revision and writ petition were dismissed as the revisionist had withdrawn the applications. The interim order, if any, was also vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 310 of 2011
Revisionist :- Le. Karnal R..K. Singh Opposite Party :- Manoj Kumar Sabnani And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Swapnil Kumar,Praduman Tiwari,Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi,Sanjeev Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Re: Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No.3 of 2018
Heard Sri S.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant/revisionist.
Learned counsel for the revisionist states that the revisionist does not want to press the present revision and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In such view of the matter, present withdrawal application stands allowed and the revision is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Re: Writ petition
Present revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 30.7.2018 SKG
Le. Karnal R.K. Singh
Manoj Kumar Sabnani
Vivek Kumar Birla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court