Civil Revision No. 256 of 2010 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the revisionist had no appearance to press the matter on 3.7.2018. Interim order stands discharged.
Dismissed the revision for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 256 of 2010
Revisionist :- Sanjeev Sharma Opposite Party :- Smt. Bhawna Sharma Counsel for Revisionist :- Anurag Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rahul Verma
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.
The revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- Priyanka 3.7.2018 KUMAR MISHRAANJANI Digitally signed by ANJANI KUMAR MISHRADN: C=IN, O=Personal, PostalCode=211001, S=Uttar Pradesh, Phone=f6e3ce979d8983acfc0b3ea049885bf64ad5bbb33050e3dfe3e210927d94f413, SERIALNUMBER=004ee64f25f9f36f85dbdc71f5b0ec1e2f0938431e25dbbadc93823915b36c6f, CN=ANJANI KUMAR MISHRAReason: I am the author of this documentLocation: Date: 2018-07-03 15:37:20
Anjani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
