In a contempt application, the High Court held that the applicant's claim had already been addressed on merits in the order of 24.04.2018 and allowed it no further survival. The petition was disposed of without deciding any specific issue as the matter was already settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2074 of 2018
Applicant :- Somdutt Vishwakarma Opposite Party :- Sri Padmakar Singh, Director (Paramedical), Medical And Health Services Counsel for Applicant :- Pusp Raj Singh
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Neeraj Upadhyay, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel who has appeared on instructions. The opposite party has after due consideration of the claim of the applicant negatived the same in terms of the order dated 24 April 2018. The order notes that the applicant did not even apply pursuant to the advertisement dated 12 November 2007.
Since the claim of the applicant has been attended to on merits, nothing further survives on this petition, which shall stand disposed of .
Order Date :- 15.5.2018 Arun K. Singh
Somdutt Vishwakarma
Sri Padmakar Singh
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
