Allowed

Sonu Alias Sandeep Verma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC21 Feb 2018BAIL/6485/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant in a criminal matter involving offences under the IPC. The applicant alleged false implication and planted recovery. Balancing the reformative theory of punishment against the severity of charges, the court allowed bail on a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with personal bond of Rs. 1 Lac and two sureties of Rs. 1 Lac each.

Sonu Alias Sandeep Verma Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6485 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Sonu Alias Sandeep Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Dutt Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Chandra Dutt, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Purushottam Maurya, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant and a false recovery of motorcycle has been shown from the possession of the applicant, which is planted. It is further submitted that there is no any independent witness of the alleged recovery. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 17.01.2018. The applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment , the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Sonu Alias Sandeep Verma involved in Case Crime No. 018 of 2018, under Section 41, 411, 414, 419, 420, 467, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Suriyawan, District Bhadohi be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond (Rs. One

¶10

Lac) with two sureties (One should be of a family member) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶11

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶12

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶13

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶14

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 21.2.2018 Arti Sharma

Sonu Alias Sandeep Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Alias Sandeep Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Gurjar Vs State of U.P.

Rahul Pandit Vs State of U.P.

Dilawar Singh Vs State of U.P.

Shailendra Kumar Maurya Vs State of U.P.

Rupesh Vs State of U.P.

Devdatt Alias Pati Ram and Other Vs State of U.P.