Allowed

Lalta Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC19 Mar 2018BAIL/5888/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court considered a bail application by Lalta Yadav, aged 62, charged under Sections 466, 467, 468 and 120B IPC. Acknowledging allegations of false implication and the applicant's age, the Court granted bail with conditions to ensure witness safety and trial cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with a personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions of attending trial, not tampering with witnesses, and no illegal activities.

Lalta Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5888 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Lalta Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Purushottam Maurya, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the applicant is 62 years old person of unsound mind and he has been falsely implicated by the complainant because he is family member of the co-accused Raju and in-laws of the complainant. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 19.12.2017.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Lalta Yadav involved in Case Crime No. 1441 of 2017, under Sections 466, 467, 468, 120B I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Azamgarh, District Azamgarh be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶11

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶12

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶13

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 19.3.2018 Arti

Lalta Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalta Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakhan Singh Vs State of U.P.

Pappu Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Pappu @ Krishna Murari Vs State of U.P.

Ramayan Prasad Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Damyanti Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Dinesh Kumar Agarwal Vs State of U.P.