Allowed

Satish Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Feb 2018BAIL/5112/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Bail Application allowed. The court, perceiving a case for bail despite the gravity of the offence involving attempt to murder and criminal intimidation, granted bail subject to standard conditions including a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties with conditions against tampering with evidence, intimidating witnesses, and committing similar offences.

Satish Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 22

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5112 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Satish Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State, and perused the record.

¶7

According to prosecution case, FIR was lodged against Satish Yadav, Ram Sagar, Arjun Singh and Shera alleging that on 5.1.2018 at 8:30 P.M. and abused complainant, his wife and mother; Satish Yadav shot fire at Krishna Kant but he escaped himself.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; he has criminal history of four cases which have been explained; there was no independent witness; nobody sustained any injury; he is languishing in jail since 8.1.2018(more than one month) and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶9

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let applicant Satish Yadav involved in Case Crime No.30 of 2018, under Sections 452, 307, 504,506 IPC, Police Station Mohammadabad, District Farrukhabad be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-

¶12

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶13

2.The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution

¶14

witness.

¶15

3.The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶16

4.The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶17

5.The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 20.2.2018 P.P.

Satish Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satish Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Chand Vs State of U.P.

Ranvir Vs State of U.P.

Prem Chand Vs State of U.P.

Ahsutosh Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Ramraj Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Subash Chand Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another