Allowed

Dinesh Kumar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Dec 2018BAIL/48762/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 147, 148, 149, 452, 506, 302, 307 IPC, the court allowed the applicant's plea of parity with a co-accused granted bail and his alleged innocence, granting bail on a personal bond and two sureties subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Dinesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 50

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48762 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Lavkush Kumar Bhatt Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶6

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that identically placed co-accused Amit @ Guddu has been granted bail by another Bench of this Court on 9.10.2018 vide Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 38078 of 2018. He further submits that the role of the applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused, therefore, the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. It is next submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 01.11.2018 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶7

On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and also the bail order passed in respect of co-accused Amit @ Guddu and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant Dinesh Kumar involved in Case Crime No. 326 of 2018, under Section 147, 148, 149, 452, 506, 302, 34, 307 IPC and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Nawabganj, District Farrukhabad be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.

¶10

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. 2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. 3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶11

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶12

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶13

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶14

Order Date :- 20.12.2018/Sachdeva

Dinesh Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhu Chauhan and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Imran Vs State of U.P.

Manoj Nishad Vs State of U.P.

Awadhesh Vs State of U.P.

Deepak Singh @ Nate Vs State of U.P.

Shahzad Vs State of U.P.