Allowed

Sunil and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Nov 2018BAIL/43791/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous bail application, the court allowed bail to Sunil and Dinesh Kumar accused under the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities Act, 1986, citing no criminal history beyond the gang chart and cooperation during bail.

What did the court decide?

Applicants to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each subject to standard conditions.

Sunil and Another Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 27 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43791 of 2018 Applicant :- Sunil And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.

¶3

Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶5

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that according to gang chart, two cases had been shown against applicants and they are on bail. The applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. They are languishing in jail since 17.8.2018 (three months) and in case they are released on bail, they will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial. It is further submitted that no bail cancellation application has been moved till today regarding the cases shown in the gang chart.

¶6

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail and admitted that there is no criminal history against the applicants except the gang chart and further he could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicants.

¶7

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, provision for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶8

Let the applicants Sunil and Dinesh Kumar involved in Case Crime No. 135 of 2018, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Basaimohammadpur, District - Firozabad be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:

¶9

The applicants will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶10

The applicants will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶11

The applicants will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶12

The applicants shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected.

¶13

The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 17.11.2018//A. Singh

Sunil and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yasin Vs State of U.P.

Islamuddin Vs State of U.P.

Rohit Vs State of U.P.

Ujma Vs State of U.P.

Naved Ahmad Vs State of U.P.

Talib Vs State of U.P.