Allowed

Raghunath v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 Feb 2018BAIL/4264/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal M.C. Bail Application No. 4264 of 2018, the Court granted bail to Raghunath, an accused who had absconded and was rearrested. The release was conditional on furnishing a personal bond and sureties and adhering to standard bail terms without addressing the merits of the charge.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount.

Raghunath Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 22

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4264 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Raghunath Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶6

Initially the accused was on bail and due to his absence N.B.W. was issued on 2.6.2016 and he was arrested by the police on 7.12.2017 till then he is languishing in jail (near about two months).

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant that applicant was gone to Rajasthan for doing work due to which he could not appear before the Court; he is a poor person; in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial. One more opportunity be granted to the applicant.

¶8

Learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail and admitted that the applicant has got no criminal history.

¶9

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Raghunath involved in S.T. No. 115 of 1998 arising out of Case Crime Nos. 359 of 1998, 160 of 1998, 161 of 1998 and 162 of 1998, under Sections 393 and 307 IPC and Section 4/25 and 25 Arms Act, Police Station Kayamganj, District - Farrukhabad be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:

¶11

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶12

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶13

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶14

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶15

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 6.2.2018

¶18

A. Singh

Raghunath v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raghunath v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amar Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Suraj Sonkar Vs State of U.P.

Ramim @ Sheru Vs State of U.P.

Dhaniram Vs State of U.P.

Pushpendra Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Sharma Vs State of U.P. and Another